the shoes are a one off event whittle hence the learning to walk in heels, po is 5'9 three half heels just tipping over 6 foot. (the shoes are more like 4.5 heels) i only 5'6 so without heels on the day she tuck me under her arm hhmmmm not advisible. But at last iv my b**DY heels masterd. then back to sencible shoes lol

can i peace keep over and above size diffrence in hypophalimise or hypocamble (brain area) seems last i heard that was the only biological corralation in relasion to homesexuality in either males or females (even at that not all homosexules have this diffrence and some hetrosexule do have this diffrence). Iv not heard of genetic anything being found in relashion to homosexuality.
indivduel development, socilizasion, spiritule emotional compatibility with the same sex, dislike for trates (mental, emotional etc) in oppisite sex. A concise choice to be homosexule for other reasons. ....Just out and out fun...
all being given for reasons to homesexuality prefrance and love. who knows what is just is and i am all the happier for it.

ARISTOLE clamed WOMEN were genertic DEFORMITIES as we were incompleate men lacking one of the necassary bodies (spiritule) hence we should naturally be subordinate to men due to our incompleatness. ALL FEMALES ARE DEFORMED MEN silly Billy, baaa

valerie Solanas (1968) turn the same type of comments upside dowen and clamed the male to be a biological accident (the y gene is an incompleate X (female) gene) Hence males are incompleate females due to their incompleate chromosomes.

Biology and genetics aint enough in of themselfs to catigirise homosexuality all people are more than their genertics, don't you ladies think? But it still ramains a sudictive method of explinasion (genetics, biology) for something that dosen't need explinasion! or does the couse of homesexuality need defining in society? and it's me thats got it wrong

celtic_flame